The only difference is the name, really. So what Microsoft did was:. The upper image is a screenshot taken in Vista. The lower image is Windows 7. Spot the difference. I bet you a florin that you can't. Because there is not any. It's just one image really. Because they are identical. Windows 7 is at best a service pack for Windows Vista.
Sort of like SP2 for XP. This subtle fact has evaded everyone. But not me. Windows 7 requirements are identical to Windows Vista. In late , it was okay. While I still can't understand why an operating system needs 15GB to install and ends with close to 7GB of hard disk space populated, most people don't really care.
What Microsoft did was freeze Vista and port it into future three years. This gave them ample time to iron out their issues. Yes, there were some driver issues for some people, but most of those were ironed out pretty quickly when developers finally realized that yes, they did have to get off their ass and write new drivers, or else people would quit buying their hardware. It's unfortunate that most developers were lazy during the beta; it wasn't Microsoft's fault.
I didn't see Windows 7 as anything more than a service pack for Vista and was outraged that I'd have to pay so much for something that was more of an update than an upgrade. But I did upgrade, because in comparison to 7, Vista isn't as good. I saved money by getting a technet subscription, and was able to update several computers for a reasonable price. I look forward to 8. I don't expect 9 to be much of a leap from 8.
Vista was great, in its time. Good riddance to the XP that it replaced. However, Vista is dead now and should stay in its coffin. I suppose some people just don't have the means to upgrade, but I really can't understand why anybody would still be using Vista when 7 is available. It's 8 years old now, and it shows. I too always liked Vista and never had any serious issues with it.
To be honest I think a lot of the Vista hate stems largely from media hyperbole and word of mouth from people who had heard it wasnt very good and thus decided to preach that as fact. Microsoft made some very clear and huge mistakes with Vista's launch which irreparably damaged its reputation, but the OS itself from a technical standpoint was actually quite good and paved the way for a much leaner and cleaner OS.
For those interested in the technical stuff, I suggest reading the Windows Internals 5th Edition book which details at length the changes made under the hood to Vista and thus all subsequent versions of Windows. I really can't understand why anybody would still be using Vista when 7 is available. I paid for it got the Win 7 upgrade dvd but reverted back to Vista and it just looks better imo.
I know I can use third-party themes that make 7 look like Vista, but last time I did that I had to reinstall because the desktop couldn't load. Why would you want it to look like Vista?
Which is also available for Vista. At the end of the day you can use whichever OS you would prefer to use. Most of the points you make are to do with the aesthetics which I can appreciate is an individual choice. Why anyone would want to use a. BMP file for a wallpaper is beyond me though. It's such a hideous format in my mind. After that I would strongly recommend changing your OS. I'm not sure if your trolling or not? For the record i personally liked Vista and used it since it was in beta, however even since the early Windows 7 betas my opinion has always been Windows 7 is everything Vista wanted to be with lots of polish.
Brandon H Supervisor Posted April 4, Seizure Posted April 4, It's good enough, but if you're willing to put forward the cash, I'd recommend going to 7.
Anything from NT 5. XP1 Posted April 4, DrJohnSmitherson Posted April 4, Jason S. Global Moderator Posted April 5, Global Moderator. Posted April 5, Neo Posted April 5, Considering Windows 7 really isn't that big of a step up from Windows Vista I would say yes. Subject Delta Posted April 5, Vista's a great OS. Only an idiot would say it's still bad after 4 years of updates.
Vista with SP2 should be alright. Ci7 Posted April 6, Posted April 6, Jen Smith Posted April 6, You can do this by using Windows Update or by going to the device manufacturer's website. If you have an uninterruptible power supply UPS connected to your computer, disconnect the connecting serial cable before installing SP2.
The installation automatically attempts to detect devices connected to serial ports, and UPS equipment can cause problems with the detection process. It's fine to leave your computer connected to a UPS for power. Some antivirus software might prevent SP2 from installing, or might slow down the installation. You can try temporarily disabling your antivirus software.
If you do so, be sure that you're aware of the risks involved, and be sure to enable it after the service pack is installed. Make sure you have enough free disk space to install SP2 even though much of that space will be reclaimed after the installation.
If your computer is set to automatically install updates, you'll be prompted by Windows Update to install SP2. Follow the instructions on the screen. If you aren't prompted to install SP2, follow these steps:. Click View available updates. If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
Install any updates listed as Recommended or Important , return to the Windows Update page, and then click Check for updates. Follow the instructions on your screen.
0コメント